Sunday, February 17, 2013

Randomness: Maybe there’s a way to find out if reality is a computer simulation | Redux

Randomness: Maybe there’s a way to find out if reality is a computer simulation

ER simulations
ER simulations by Physicians for Human Rights - Israel
License (according to Flickr): Attribution License
Excerpt:

In olden days, before the Star Trek holodeck and motion pictures like TRON and The Matrix, philosophers used to question whether life was but a dream. Nowadays they're more worried that reality could possibly be simply a computer simulation. Sure, that's not very likely. However you cannot rule out the possibility. Computer systems simulate all types of things, and some experts have seriously recommended that nature's supposedly rock-solid reality is really simply some smart alien teenager's science fair project. The majority of individuals respond to that recommendation with a shrug. Exactly what does it matter? You need to row, row, row your boat anyhow. As Gottfried Leibniz pointed out over three centuries ago, all that matters is that the globe acts real enough so that sound reasoning will not trick you.

Keywords:

simulation Beane lattice simulation reality cosmic rays Star Trek holodeck future simulation efforts science fair project smart alien teenager merely simulated scientists simulations recent paper online high-energy cosmic rays present-day computing power infinitesimally short distances Washington collaborators Zohreh infinitely precise laws perplexing physics problems shortsighted budget cutters Silas Beane future observations measure cosmic microwave radiation software simulation rock-solid reality lattice simulations colleagues simulated universes possibility simulation hypothesis simulated automaton physicists rock-hard reality simulated inhabitants ever-smaller pixelations high-energy rays humans inhabit quantum chromodynamics real world subatomic particles limited thinking Gottfried Leibniz complete simulations atomic nuclei sound reasoning quarks interact approximate laws human scientists human body infinite precision future scientists

People:

Silas Beane

Overall Sentiment: 0.160015

Relevance: 0.43712

SentimentQuote
0“It stands to reason,” write Beane ...
0“It stands to reason,” write Beane and colleagues, “that future simulation efforts will continue to extend to ever-smaller pixelations and ever-larger volumes of space-time.”
0.07402“If there are sufficient high-performance computing resources available, then future scientists will likely make the effort to perform complete simulations of molecules, cells, humans and even beyond,” write Beane, ...
Sentiment Stats:
  • Number of Quotes: 3
  • Aggregate Sentiment: 0.07402
  • Mean: 0.024673333333333
  • Standard Deviation: 1

Zohreh Davoudi

Overall Sentiment: -0.312557

Relevance: 0.161964

Martin Savage

Overall Sentiment: 0

Relevance: 0.149227

Key:

  • Aggregate Sentiment is meant to be an indicator of an individual's overall sentiment.
  • The Mean is meant to be an indicator of an individual's average comment sentiment.
  • The Standard Deviation, when there are enough quotes, will indicate an individual's consistency of sentiment (i.e. a Standard Deviation of 0 would mean they were very consistent in their sentiment and 1 would mean they were very inconsistent).

Note that quote stats are likely to be meaningless beyond the aggregate score due to the tiny sample size. However, they are always provided just in case you find something useful there.

Additional Info:

Site Meta Details

No comments:

Post a Comment